|
I’m with an ISP running Billmax
version 1.5.4 (Redhat platform) Today I came across a somewhat alarming problem. Two
different accounts (both of which in the open state) were seemingly allowed to posses
identical service names. Each account had a service of a differing type (but,
as said, same service name). I took a look at our service definitions for each
of the two services types in question and indeed both have Name Conflict set to
“Never Ok”. I also went to verify with a few of our test accounts and Billmax behaved as expected… I attempted to add a new
service of the same name as an already existing one to a test account. Billmax did indeed not allow me to do this. But the
question still stands, how did these two accounts end up with services of
identical names if name conflict is set to never ok? Thanks for your help Robert Gorrell Appalachian Technologies |